Sunday, January 13, 2008

Comin'atcha From Behind My Wall

If I were to explain to you that Black Sabbath was all about peace & love, what would your gut reaction be? Have you ever listened to Sabbath? Or are your opinions based on hearsay? Likewise, if I were to say to you that when James Hetfield, in the song "Blackened," sings: "See your mother, put to death, see your mother die..." what he is actually referring to is the damage that we humans are inflicting upon the Earth, and that the song itself is meant to educate and warn us; would you take the time to process this? Or would you cling to that misguided impression that rock bands like Metallica and Black Sabbath are somehow dark, wicked, evil; seeking to subvert the youth?

Inside each and every one of us, there exists a strange tendency to form opinions about things we have no experience with. "He said, She said." Sometimes, that's all it takes for us to make up our minds, without ever having taken the time to explore whether or not the generalizations are true. The attitude accompanying this feeling is one of "why should I?" We then go to great lengths to rationalize why we should not. What a waste of our time it "might" be, were we to make an effort to see for ourselves, only to learn that those sentiments were true. Once bitten, twice shy, right?

Swaddled in prejudice, we suckle the tit of conventional wisdoms.

What has become of the old adage "Nothing ventured, nothing gained...?" It's been replaced by that most backwards of mantras "Better safe than sorry." Just the other day, I found myself stuck in that same untenable, paralyzed line of thinking. Thankfully, blogging, and writing; conversations with friends always seems to provide me with a much needed catharsis, and I move forward. But there are some people who don't. They spend their entire lives avoiding the choices, the experiences that would allow them to free their minds of all the preconceived, preconditioned jargon. A separation from the programming, a disconnection from the matrix.

Why do we build these walls, these fortresses of solitude? Is it because we are trying to keep new ideas out? Or is it that we are looking to keep the old ideas in? I believe now that the answer is buried somewhere within a lesson taught to me by an old prof. of mine. "People do not like to question their reality, because it requires that they reinvent themselves. Doing so asks them to relearn what they thought they already knew. People desire a sense of security, and pointing out that their view of reality is flawed, removes that safety zone."

If that is true, which I believe it to be, why then am I unable to just live and let live? What drives me, like some obsessesive compulsive to want, to need, to burst the bubble? This cultural coma that so many seem content to slumber through? I'd answer that if I were able to, but I am not. I don't know whether to call this a purpose, or a naive delusion. Every bit as much a creature of habit as the rest of you hairless monkeys, I do what I have to do, and hope that in the end, there was some reason for having done it.

14 comments:

Carol said...

No one makes it out alive so why be afraid to take chance? I do not know the answer to your questions either. I think that people here in this country have become lazy and complacent because few have ever really had to struggle to survive.
Instant gratification and all that...

Nelson M. said...

I have to completely agree with your old prof. The need for security is closely linked with outright fear, fear of the unknown.

"Why do we build these walls, these fortresses of solitude?"

Are they of solitude though? Because the masses tend toward sticking to old ideas, and along with the unknown of change, there is the comfort that there are masses of people that will stick to old ideas with you. Then you get groupthink.

"What drives me, like some obsessesive compulsive to want, to need, to burst the bubble?"

I have the same need too. You discover a new perspective, and it is so appealing, that you want others to see the same thing. It's not the common view, and you want to right the predominant view because it would make a better more understanding world. It boils down to: You care for your fellow men and women.

Bretwalda Edwin-Higham said...

Inside each and every one of us, there exists a strange tendency to form opinions about things we have no experience with.


Hmmm - have to think this one through.

Dave J. said...

Carol,
Good advice, and if I were the only person I needed to worry about, I wouldn't give it a second thought. But as a father and husband, my responsibilities extend beyond self, and the worry that I experience over relative safety or security is 99% aimed at my continued ability to be there for them.

Basically, as a writer, I am struggling with role conflict. I cannot be a radical, revolutionary thinker come what may, when I also must consider my family. Since I am not a one or the other type guy, I need to figure out how to merge the two aspects within my life.

You bring up the struggle to survive, and this is something you and I have in common. We both left home prematurely, and had to learn from the street so to speak. This may have been a free-thinking catalyst for us.

Dave J. said...

Nelson M.,
What's happenin'? On one level, I have to completely agree with you. On the other, I think that we all have layers of walls. Public, and personal. Have you ever read August Wilson's Fences? An excellent exploration of the walls that we all throw up, external, internal, layer upon layer of blockages in our lives. I think at such point as group think no longer appeals, we do find ourselves in some form of solitude. I'm just glad that blogging and school to a lesser extent have allowed me to meet up with like-minded folk.

Ah, compassion. Indeed my friend.

Dave J. said...

James,
It can be very difficult to step outside our schemas of the world.

Tom said...

Dave, yeah, it's strange both ways. It's like we have this love-hate relationship with being wrong. Great essay.

Dave J. said...

Tom,
I appreciate it brother. This one was more of an exhale than anything else.

Nice way to describe it T, there should be a term for this feeling, something like: the ambivalent corrector response.

Carol said...

You make a good point that you have your wife and child to think about which prevents you from speaking as you might really think/feel. I suppose then you might benefit from staying away from controversial issues...unless you were to write under a psyedo (sp) or Blog anonymously....

The Constant Skeptic said...

I truly believe that your greatness in this life is measured by how much you can break free from the societal mold that is so tempting to conform to. All of our great leaders and luminaries throughout our relatively short modern history on this earth were truly awakened to their full potential as real human beings. I believe Bertrand Russell also talked of this in one