Monday, February 25, 2008

A Leopard is Not Defined by Her Spots

While breaking for lunch, I decided to see if there was anything worth watching on the tube. Surfing the channels in aimless avoidance of commercials, (I expect usually to find nothing), and by then my meal is finished. This time was different though. I happened across an oddly unique nature documentary that featured a lioness mothering an infant deer of some sort. It seems the lioness had lost her pride to catastrophic circumstance, and as sole survivor had undergone some degree of post traumatic stress, which it was believed contributed to her adopting the baby deer.

For days, and then weeks, researchers followed them. As time wore on, the lioness grew thinner, and the film crew was certain she would soon eat the baby deer. She did not. In fact, she did not feed herself for nearly a month, and it was only after the baby deer had died that she showed any interest in tending to her own needs. According to the researchers, over the course of the next year, she adopted five more deer.

What fascinates me is that this type of behavior on the part of the lion flies in the face of conventional wisdom. "Animals" are dumb, right? They don't experience love, and they certainly don't understand the concept of putting other individuals first. I mean, come on, they're "animals." Incapable of generating any thoughts beyond the primal... right?

14 comments:

Tom said...

It's so important to be able to look through this veil of crap that calls itself "knowledge."

Not knocking knowledge (say that fast), but I think we have to take it down a few pegs and remember that reality comes first.

franscud said...

I think there are a lot of myths about the human/animal divide that we still perpetuate in order to place ourselves above all other creation. This may be traced back to the Biblical creation story too ... I'm not sure. I think it's just as valuable to discover what connects us, and I think it's said that false pride leads goeth before the fall :).

Valentin said...

Yo !

@ franscud

Sure all mixing comes way back since biblical ages.
They tell us it was Noel build that ship to save animals .. sometime I feel it was in fact animals who had gave signs to Noel something bad will happen and is time to get his stuff and run like hell .. I can prove that by fact even in todays days we relay -as example- on rats behaviour to be sure a ship is sinking ...

:-))

@ Dave

as religious extremist and reincarnation fan, I must tell you that that lioness was actually reincarnation of a female deer or maybe she was near to reach purusha realizing the bad (killings) were done in previous lifes and trying to fix things ...

as kant follower I`ll tell you that this event is a surprise for any is not ready to accept that anything is possible .. while we humans (thanks, Kant), we are not able to understand what is to be a lioness because we can not be a lioness ...

as I am immortal (and genius too, but let`s not talk about that), U wonder why would this event be so important to you ... as I know you have also applied to become immortal, so this won`t have to be a surprise behaviour for a lioness (yes, THAT lioness also applied for immortality ..)

ah, one question, Dave ..
"Labels: Compassion, Intelligence, Nature, Nurture "

in the name of holly Mendeleev table, what have in common compassion and inteligence ?

Bretwalda Edwin-Higham said...

Good point here, Dave and I'll return to it on my blog later. Like the urban and urbane too. Food for thought.

Alicia said...

I remember seeing something about that lioness. I've always believed that the animals are far more complex than we humans give them credit for.

Dave J. said...

Tom,
I couldn't agree more. We need a healthy dose of re-evaluative humility before we continue to pretend that we understand the world.

Dave J. said...

Fran,
Yeah, definitely to do with our superiority complex. Revealing connections rather than divergences, I like that.

Dave J. said...

Val,
/Rubs eyes. "Can it be?" True to form with the quick wit even!

Your question is both humorous, and sad. The answer: yes?

Intelligence can be defined in so many ways... but I would say this. If one does not understand and value compassion, then one cannot be considered intelligent in the well-rounded sense.

Dave J. said...

James,
You've been a city dweller from time to time haven't you? We're on the same page with this one I bet.

Dave J. said...

Alicia,
Well said. When I see stories like this, it causes me to think exactly that.

DJ Black Adam said...

Fascinating. I think where people who believe animals don't have emotions or a dumb make their mistake, is presupposing that "emotion" can only apply to humans because of the whole soul thing.

Nelson M. said...

I really agree with franscud. We become socialized to think we are superior, but this is nothing more than a myth which makes us feel better about ourselves. In fact, if we realized how much we are like animals and them like us, maybe we can actually approach the higher moral plane too many of us think we're on.

Dave J. said...

Adam,
Yeah, there seems to be a metaphysical disconnect going on here. Not only the notion that we have souls and animals do not, but also we seem to have this need to justify the harm we cause to the Earth. Interestingly, wild "animals" don't often destroy their environment. Yet we, the civili